Framer Migration Services

When the site has become more than a launch page: a growing blog or resource library, several languages, integrations that need real code, or engineers who want the site in the same repository and review process as the product. Plan limits on CMS items, locales or seats are another signal. If designers still reshape the site every week and it is mostly marketing pages, Framer is doing its job, and Framer Development is the better call.

Not as a working, maintainable site. Framer publishes and hosts the site but offers no supported export of pages and components as code. Tools that scrape the published pages produce a snapshot that is hard to edit and breaks on the next change. CMS collections can be exported as CSV files. So a Framer migration is a recreation: the pages are rebuilt as components, using the Framer project as the design source.

The design is kept by rebuilding from the Framer project at each of its breakpoints and comparing every page side by side with the live site before sign-off. Content is kept by importing the CMS collections and downloading every image, so nothing still loads from Framer. Search traffic is protected by keeping URLs where possible, redirecting the rest, carrying titles, descriptions and headings over, and watching errors and coverage after the switch. Rankings can still move while search engines re-crawl; nobody can guarantee them.

We list them all in the audit, and you choose which carry the brand and which are decoration. The ones that matter are redone in light CSS or small scripts, tuned to feel the same, and switched off for visitors who ask for reduced motion. Heavy scroll effects that slow pages down are usually simplified, with your sign-off. The aim is the same impression with less weight.

Yes, as a design tool rather than the live site. Many teams keep Framer or Figma for exploring new pages, then hand the approved design over to be built from the site's own components. For routine changes — a new case study, a job post, an updated price — editors use the new CMS directly, with no designer or developer in the loop. What changes is that the published site no longer depends on a Framer plan, and new sections are added to the component library rather than drawn from scratch.

Framer replatforming from start to finish: we audit the project, pick the stack and CMS with you, map the collections, recreate pages and components in code, rebuild the animations that matter, move CMS items and images, reconnect forms and integrations, set redirects and metadata, rehearse the switch with a way back, and train your editors.

Editor access to the Framer project and its current plan, plus any plugins, code components or locales it relies on. Analytics and search console, the destinations of your forms, and a design owner to approve each recreated page. One approver for the stack, the redirects and go-live, and a DNS contact available on the day.

The recreated site in a repository and host you own, your collections in the new CMS, the Framer audit, the tested redirect map, a runbook for publishing and rolling back, and an editor session. Then you can cancel the Framer plan. We can continue with new pages, carry on building on Astro, or run usability testing on the key paths, each scoped separately.

The number of pages and breakpoints, how many components and CMS collections there are, which animations are kept, the forms, plugins and integrations, locales, and how many URLs need redirects. We set a custom scope and estimate in the proposal, fixed or phased, and agree the timeline once scope, access and dependencies are clear.

A redesign, new copy, new illustration or 3D work, and new platform, hosting or third-party fees. We commit to uptime and security only as far as the signed criteria go. We have no published Framer migration case yet, so we will not present one. On your project the audit and the first recreated page, matched against the original, are what you judge us by.